Research
College football temperature and scoring
College football is the one sport that plays through August heat and November freeze in the same season, which makes it the best dataset we hold for testing what the thermometer is worth. We took every dry outdoor game in our archive that carries a closing total, matched it to kickoff-hour temperature at the venue's own coordinates, and compared points scored and margin against the line to mild-weather games from the same seasons.
The headline
Across 6,593 dry outdoor games from 2016 to 2025, temperature moves scoring in the direction everyone assumes — but only the cold end moves it much. Games below freezing score -5.2 points against the mild control (t = -3.08). Games at 85°F and above score +1.8 points (t = 2.40). Against the closing total, neither end shows an edge.
Freezing games
-5.2
106 games under 32°F
Season-adjusted vs mild control · t = -3.08
Mild control
55.1
2,443 games at 50–69°F
Sample average: 55.4 points against a 55.0 closing total
Per 10°F
+0.6
Points, across the full range
Fitted across 6,593 games
Key finding in plain English
Freezing kickoff temperatures lower college football scoring by about -5.2 points compared with mild weather, a result that clears our pre-set significance threshold on 106 games. Heat of 85°F or above raises scoring only modestly (+1.8 points). Against the closing total, no temperature band produced a reliable edge — the market appears to price the thermometer correctly.
Every temperature band against the mild control
| Kickoff temperature | Games | Avg temp | Total points | Closing total | Over rate | Points vs closing total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Freezing: under 32°F | 106 | 27.3°F | 49.8-5.2t = -3.08 | 50.3 | 47.6% | -0.9t = -0.60 |
| Cold: 32–49°F | 908 | 43.2°F | 54.5-0.8t = -1.19 | 54.0 | 49.3% | +0.2t = 0.29 |
| Mild: 50–69°F (control) | 2,443 | 60.8°F | 55.1 | 54.7 | 50.0% | control |
| Warm: 70–84°F | 2,515 | 77.4°F | 55.8+0.9t = 1.77 | 55.5 | 49.5% | -0.1t = -0.20 |
| Hot: 85°F and above | 621 | 89.4°F | 56.8+1.8t = 2.40 | 56.3 | 50.1% | 0.0t = 0.06 |
The smaller figure in each cell is the season-adjusted gap against the mild control, with its t statistic. Roughly 2 is our threshold. Only the freezing and hot bands clear it on points scored, and no band clears it against the closing total. Bands under 40 games are greyed out and flagged.
Season by season
Scoring and closing totals drift year to year, and so does the weather mix of a schedule, which is why every comparison above measures a game against its own season rather than against the pooled sample.
That drift is large here and worth stating plainly: dry-game scoring falls steadily from about 57.9 points in 2016 to about 52.8 in 2025, a decline of roughly five points across the span. Because each game is measured against its own season's average, that is a level shift the adjustment removes rather than a signal. We checked it directly: run the same band comparisons with no season adjustment at all and the gaps move by no more than 0.2 points (freezing reads −5.2 adjusted against −5.3 unadjusted). The reason is that the temperature mix of the schedule is stable — the share of games in each band varies only a few percentage points year to year, with no trend that lines up with the scoring decline, so no band is quietly loaded into the high- or low-scoring end of the era.
One thing the split does show: the freezing effect is stronger in the recent half of the sample. Across 2016–2020 (51 freezing games) it reads −3.6 points with t = −1.44; across 2021–2025 (55 games) it reads −6.7 points with t = −2.94. Both halves point the same way and neither is large enough on its own to settle whether that is drift or noise, so we quote the pooled figure and will re-check the split as more freezing games land.
| Season | Dry games with a total | Points per game | Closing total | Avg temp | Over rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 641 | 57.9 | 57.3 | 68.1°F | 47.7% |
| 2017 | 614 | 56.3 | 56.4 | 67.4°F | 47.9% |
| 2018 | 661 | 57.6 | 56.7 | 65.3°F | 50.4% |
| 2019 | 698 | 56.4 | 56.4 | 66.3°F | 48.6% |
| 2020 | 434 | 57.4 | 56.8 | 60.2°F | 50.9% |
| 2021 | 713 | 55.0 | 55.7 | 66.8°F | 48.2% |
| 2022 | 724 | 54.5 | 54.5 | 66.7°F | 50.3% |
| 2023 | 722 | 53.9 | 52.5 | 68.6°F | 51.3% |
| 2024 | 678 | 53.2 | 52.2 | 67.9°F | 51.3% |
| 2025 | 708 | 52.8 | 52.5 | 68.8°F | 50.3% |
What actually holds up
- Freezing is the finding. Under 32°F, games score -5.2 points against the mild control with t = -3.08, on 106 games — past our 40-game minimum, though still the smallest band here.
- Merely cold is nothing. The 32–49°F band (908 games) reads -0.8 points with t = -1.19. A jacket-weather forecast is not information.
- Heat helps a little. 85°F and above adds +1.8 points (t = 2.40), consistent with the overall +0.6 points per 10°F gradient.
- The market prices it. No band beats the closing total on our test, which is the opposite of what we found for heavy rain in college football. Temperature is priced; heavy rain is not fully.
Method and limits
- Sample: 6,593 dry outdoor college football games, 2016–2025, each with a final score, a closing total and kickoff-hour temperature, averaging 66.9°F. Indoor venues and closed roofs are excluded entirely.
- Wet games (0.25 mm or more of game-window rain) are excluded so the temperature result is not carrying our separately measured rain effect.
- Weather: hourly reanalysis at the venue's own coordinates, read at the kickoff hour. Archived model data, not a gauge reading at the stadium.
- Control group: 50–69°F. Every figure is season-adjusted — each game against its own season's average, for both points and margin against the closing total.
- Odds: closing lines come from a sports data feed rather than a single sportsbook. Games with no recorded line in any source are simply absent. Live in-play prices are excluded.
- The 40-game minimum and the significance threshold are house rules applied to every study before results are seen.
- Not controlled: team quality, pace and pass-run balance, wind, altitude, kickoff time of day (night games in September are cooler than the same venue at noon), and snow.
Data generated 2026-09-20. Numbers refresh as the archive tops up; corrections are dated and kept visible.
References & data sources
- Open-Meteo ERA5 historical reanalysis — archive-api.open-meteo.com (hourly game-window weather at each venue’s own coordinates)
- Open-Meteo geocoding API — open-meteo.com/en/docs/geocoding-api (venue coordinates and elevation)
- ESPN college football scoreboard and odds — espn.com/college-football (schedules, final scores and consensus closing totals)
- Internal college football game archive — venue coordinates, final scores and closing totals.
- Every dated change we have made to a published study is listed on our corrections log.
Where this is applied
These findings feed the game-time read on every College Football venue page, using the same sample-size and significance rules published here.
OverUnderWeather Research Desk
Independent data analysis on public sports and weather records. Studies match historical game outcomes to archived game-window weather, apply pre-set sample and significance rules, and publish null results when that is what the data show. Editorial policy and corrections log.
Frequently asked
Does cold weather lower college football scoring?
Only genuine cold does. Games below freezing (106 dry outdoor games) score -5.2 points on a season-adjusted basis against the mild 50–69°F control (t = -3.08), which clears our threshold. The much larger 32–49°F band (908 games) is only -0.8 points with t = -1.19 — a chilly afternoon is not cold enough to matter.
Does heat raise scoring?
Mildly. Games at 85°F and above (621 games) score +1.8 points against the mild control with t = 2.40. The 70–84°F band reads +0.9 (t = 1.77). Across the whole sample scoring rises about +0.6 points per 10°F — a real gradient, but a small one next to the freezing drop.
Do cold or hot games beat the closing total?
No. This is the important part for anyone betting a total: no temperature band shows a significant gap against the closing number. Freezing games land -0.9 points versus the line relative to mild games (t = -0.60) and hot games 0.0 (t = 0.06). The market appears to price college football temperature correctly.
Why exclude wet games?
Because rain and cold arrive together, and rain has its own measured effect on college scoring. Every game in this study has under 0.25 mm of game-window rain, so the temperature figures are not quietly reporting the rain result. Indoor venues and closed roofs are excluded entirely.
Why a minimum sample?
Any band under 40 games is flagged and never quoted as a finding. That rule, and the significance threshold of roughly 2, are house rules applied to every study before results are seen — not thresholds chosen to admit a row we liked.
So should temperature change how I read a college football total?
Below freezing, expect a genuinely lower-scoring game — but expect the total to already reflect it. Temperature is a game-shape input here, not a price edge.